Re: SR slaves and .pgpass

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Date: 2010-06-09 03:52:55
Message-ID: 4C0F1017.3020903@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao wrote:
> Tom's proposal is very small, but we cannot distinguish the password
> for replication purpose from that for the real database named "replication".
> Is this OK? I can live with this as far as it's documented.
>
>

There is precedent for .pgpass being a bit ambiguous. See the way
"localhost" is used.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fujii Masao 2010-06-09 05:24:57 Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-09 02:58:32 Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints