| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
| Date: | 2010-11-18 19:39:46 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinhvVj9azawZZtwK0R7Rn+GLaFdVkMV-O9n0UgY@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/11/18 Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>
>
> On 11/18/2010 02:17 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> -only a few people use FOR IN SELECT UNNEST for iteration over array.
>
> How on earth do you know that? I use it a lot and I was just demonstrating
> it to a client yesterday, and I'm quite sure he will use it a lot too. I bet
> I'm far from alone.
>
how much people are active readers and writers in pg_hackers like you? :)
I didn't say so nobody use it. You, me, David. But I really didn't see
this pattern here in real applications.
Regards
Pavel
> cheers
>
> andrew
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-11-18 19:45:32 | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-11-18 19:37:40 | Re: Per-column collation |