| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
| Date: | 2010-11-18 19:45:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4CE5825C.2080803@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/18/2010 02:39 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2010/11/18 Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>:
>>
>> On 11/18/2010 02:17 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> -only a few people use FOR IN SELECT UNNEST for iteration over array.
>> How on earth do you know that? I use it a lot and I was just demonstrating
>> it to a client yesterday, and I'm quite sure he will use it a lot too. I bet
>> I'm far from alone.
>>
> how much people are active readers and writers in pg_hackers like you? :)
>
> I didn't say so nobody use it. You, me, David. But I really didn't see
> this pattern here in real applications.
>
Lots of people are told to use it on IRC. Trust me, it's getting well known.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-11-18 19:46:28 | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-11-18 19:39:46 | Re: final patch - plpgsql: for-in-array |