| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Steve Singer <ssinger(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Steve Singer <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, r t <pgsql(at)xzilla(dot)net> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index |
| Date: | 2010-12-09 20:59:29 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinSNXfO6cRbVx=bbDi0jVgpqVP0_X43nENpKZ1=@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:51 PM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> If the constraint name is not specified, we should certainly use
>> the existing index name, not randomly rename it.
>
> +1
+1
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-09 21:01:23 | Re: Why percent_rank is so slower than rank? |
| Previous Message | BRUSSER Michael | 2010-12-09 20:36:51 | Re: initdb failure with Postgres 8.4.4 |