Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Gurjeet Singh" <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Steve Singer" <ssinger(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>, "Itagaki Takahiro" <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "PGSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Steve Singer" <ssinger_pg(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, "r t" <pgsql(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index
Date: 2010-12-09 19:51:58
Message-ID: 4D00DEFE0200002500038564@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> If the constraint name is not specified, we should certainly use
> the existing index name, not randomly rename it.

+1

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2010-12-09 19:54:24 Re: BufFreelistLock
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-12-09 19:48:48 Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index