| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq changes for synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2010-11-19 14:27:06 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTinHGKcFAQydmhHM--6qU5L_x+nLBtaAsTm4wcxf@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Just in a quick scan, I don't have any objection to v2 except that the
>>> protocol documentation is lacking.
>>
>> OK, I'll mark it Waiting on Author pending that issue.
>
> The patch is touching protocol.sgml as follows. Isn't this enough?
How about some updates to the "Message Flow" section, especially the
section on "COPY Operations"?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aidan Van Dyk | 2010-11-19 14:27:51 | Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-11-19 14:16:24 | Re: Latches with weak memory ordering (Re: max_wal_senders must die) |