From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
Date: | 2010-08-06 16:50:17 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinCJixED+KtgBJgv7H0hC6PiVpx4Ec4HxsjhVa=@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello
attached updated patch with regression test
2010/8/6 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Mike Fowler <mike(at)mlfowler(dot)com> writes:
>> SELECT
>> xslt_process( ... , ... ,
>> 'n1=v1,n2=v2,n3=v3,n4=v4,n5=v5'::text)
>
> produces
>
>> <samples>
>> <sample>v1</sample>
>> <sample>v2</sample>
>> <sample>v3</sample>
>> <sample>v4</sample>
>> <sample>v5</sample>
>> </samples>
>
>> Sadly I get the following in both versions:
>
>> <samples>
>> <sample/>
>> <sample/>
>> <sample/>
>> <sample/>
>> <sample/>
>> </samples>
>
> Some examination of
> http://www.xmlsoft.org/XSLT/tutorial/libxslttutorial.html
> suggests that the parameter values need to be single-quoted,
> and indeed when I change the last part of your example to
>
> 'n1=''v1'',n2=''v2'',n3=''v3'',n4=''v4'',n5=''v5'''::text);
>
> I get
>
> xslt_process
> -----------------------
> <samples> +
> <sample>v1</sample>+
> <sample>v2</sample>+
> <sample>v3</sample>+
> <sample>v4</sample>+
> <sample>v5</sample>+
> </samples> +
>
> (1 row)
>
> So this seems to be a documentation problem more than a code problem.
>
> (It's a bit distressing to notice that the regression tests for the
> module fail to exercise 3-parameter xslt_process at all, though.)
>
??? I don't see it
Regards
Pavel Stehule
> regards, tom lane
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
xslt.diff | text/x-patch | 8.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2010-08-06 16:51:24 | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-08-06 16:46:16 | Re: refactoring comment.c |