From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: refactoring comment.c |
Date: | 2010-08-06 16:46:16 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTin9Y4TkfxxJSfsnkPiH0ovJkXBVJV2Sk6UxQfco@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 12:26 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I understand the concept and it seems like it might work. Not too keen
> on pretending a noun is a verb. That leads to erroring.
>
> <verb> SECURITY LABEL? verb = CREATE, ADD, ...
>
> Can't objects have more than one label?
>
> How will you set default security labels on objects?
>
> Where do you define labels?
>
> Will there be a new privilege to define this? Presumably object owners
> would not be able to set that themselves, otherwise you could create an
> object, add a security label to it and then use it to see other things
> at that level.
Uh, these are all good questions, but I think they'd be more
appropriate on the thread about the security label patch, to which I
linked in my previous email. Many of them have already been discussed
there.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-08-06 16:50:17 | Re: Initial review of xslt with no limits patch |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-08-06 16:26:37 | Re: refactoring comment.c |