Re: knngist - 0.8

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: knngist - 0.8
Date: 2011-02-28 19:27:22
Message-ID: AANLkTin9iiQ2CPYo3PkSuGN8B7WL_kAPAJ0GUWnEOME_@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> Since no one has stepped up to fix these issues, I have marked this
>>>> patch Returned with Feedback.
>
>>> This is just contrib/btree_GIST, yes?
>
>> Yes, core KNN was committed by Tom during the November CommitFest.
>
> Right.  However, it's disappointing that this isn't in, because the
> number of use cases for KNN-gist in core isn't very large.  We really
> need support for KNN in btree_gist to make it useful.
>
> Given that it is a contrib module, I personally wouldn't object to it
> getting patched later, like during alpha or beta.  But somebody's got
> to do the work, and I've got a dozen higher-priority problems right now.

Well, we can argue about whether it's too late for 9.1 if and when a
patch shows up. Right now we don't have that problem.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-28 19:31:53 Re: Why our counters need to be time-based WAS: WIP: cross column correlation ...
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-02-28 19:26:08 Re: mysql2pgsql.perl update