| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: knngist - 0.8 |
| Date: | 2011-03-01 18:35:20 |
| Message-ID: | 23414.1299004520@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Given that it is a contrib module, I personally wouldn't object to it
>> getting patched later, like during alpha or beta. But somebody's got
>> to do the work, and I've got a dozen higher-priority problems right now.
> Well, we can argue about whether it's too late for 9.1 if and when a
> patch shows up. Right now we don't have that problem.
We do now ...
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg00038.php
Since we appear to be still holding the commitfest open for Sync Rep,
I guess this ought to get reviewed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-01 18:42:59 | wrapping up this CommitFest (was Re: knngist - 0.8) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-01 18:29:12 | Re: Is the attribute options cache actually worth anything? |