Correct usage of FOR UPDATE?

From: Joe Carr <joe(dot)carr(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Correct usage of FOR UPDATE?
Date: 2010-12-09 19:29:42
Message-ID: AANLkTin1qX+ZSOGsvdY7RH0dkTEkxth-XaAy2DSA8HTd@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-sql

Hello,
I have a simple table-based queue system, and I'd looking for some advice on
improving my dequeue function. it boils down to:

SELECT id
FROM queue
WHERE <whereclause>
FOR UPDATE NOWAIT;

which works well, in that no item gets dequeued more that once. The issue,
however is that when a contention occurs, the error "could not obtain lock
on row in relation" is raised.

Is there a way that I can rewrite this so that when a contention occurs,
there is no error? I would like the "winning" process to lock the row, and
the "losing" process to select null rather than raise the rowlock error.

thanks beforehand for any help!

Responses

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Capobianco 2010-12-09 21:47:55 sqlplus reporting equivalent in postgres?
Previous Message Dmitriy Igrishin 2010-12-09 18:24:21 Extended query protocol and exact types matches.