From: | Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Extended query protocol and exact types matches. |
Date: | 2010-12-09 18:24:21 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikjRo4Mik19xLSzVCZ4jDdsvvshRfX1wsWCx4bd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Hey general@,
To be assured and just for calmness.
Problem:
1. CREATE TABLE test_tab (id integer, dat varchar(64));
2. INSERT INTO test_tab VALUES($1, $2) via PQexecParams,
where paramTypes[0] == OID of bigint,
paramTypes[1] == OID of text.
Questions:
Whether this case falls to
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/typeconv-query.html ?
Is such cases safe or it is recommended (best) to specify a
OIDs which are exact matches ?
PS.
I know, that queries like SELECT $1 does not work without
specifying OID or without rewriting it to e.g. SELECT $1::text.
Thanks.
--
// Dmitriy.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brady Mathis | 2010-12-09 18:54:37 | Re: Using PG with Windows EFS or TrueCrypt for encryption |
Previous Message | Reid Thompson | 2010-12-09 17:42:25 | Re: Tuning Postgres for single user manipulating large amounts of data |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-12-09 19:48:48 | Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index |
Previous Message | Gurjeet Singh | 2010-12-09 18:09:44 | Re: Patch to add a primary key using an existing index |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Carr | 2010-12-09 19:29:42 | Correct usage of FOR UPDATE? |
Previous Message | Edgardo Portal | 2010-12-09 16:16:48 | Re: concatenate question |