| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups |
| Date: | 2011-01-17 15:20:57 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimdPn6krwFsw-qxMSYjs6E8mwY1C28d2_suN5Ov@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 16:18, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Hmm. I don't like those names at all :(
>
> I agree. I don't think your original names are bad, as long as
> they're well-documented. I sympathize with Simon's desire to make it
> clear that these use the replication framework, but I really don't
> want the command names to be that long.
Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be
renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream
is a lot more specific than that)
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Noah Misch | 2011-01-17 15:22:51 | Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW] |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-17 15:18:44 | Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups |