Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup for streaming base backups
Date: 2011-01-17 15:27:37
Message-ID: 1295278057.3282.2056.camel@ebony
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, 2011-01-17 at 16:20 +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 16:18, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 8:55 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> >> Hmm. I don't like those names at all :(
> >
> > I agree. I don't think your original names are bad, as long as
> > they're well-documented. I sympathize with Simon's desire to make it
> > clear that these use the replication framework, but I really don't
> > want the command names to be that long.
>
> Actually, after some IM chats, I think pg_streamrecv should be
> renamed, probably to pg_walstream (or pg_logstream, but pg_walstream
> is a lot more specific than that)

pg_stream_log
pg_stream_backup
?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/books/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2011-01-17 15:28:27 Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]
Previous Message Noah Misch 2011-01-17 15:22:51 Re: texteq/byteaeq: avoid detoast [REVIEW]