From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
Date: | 2010-10-04 17:32:34 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimd6mY7MO_aDGDCDK0XW29OUS6dUw48CnDSfAH-@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> On 26 September 2010 18:07, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 26 September 2010 17:49, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>>> I attach a patch which adds all functions (or at least the ones I
>>> found) into the index so that they can be easily located. Previously
>>> there were no entries for most of these at all in the index. I also
>>> removed the entries for count, max, min and sum in the tutorial area
>>> as per this discussion:
>>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-09/msg00119.php .
>>> These are no indexed on the aggregate function page.
>>>
>>> While I was updating the functions section, I also alphabetised any
>>> unsorted function tables.
>>
>> I don't think my email reached the list, so reattaching a gzipped version.
>
> Is this on the radar? Copying in -hackers in case.
I took a quick look at it before, but it was too much to commit
without more scrutiny than I had time to give it. Perhaps it would be
useful to decompose this into several patches, and/or add it to the
next CF.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-10-04 17:50:29 | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
Previous Message | Thom Brown | 2010-10-04 08:24:49 | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Glaesemann | 2010-10-04 17:38:33 | Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-04 17:24:37 | Re: ALTER DATABASE RENAME with HS/SR |