From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Hakan Kocaman <hkocam(at)googlemail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
Date: | 2010-10-04 17:38:33 |
Message-ID: | 1D0057B0-7151-425C-8096-56836F9AB4BD@seespotcode.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Oct 4, 2010, at 13:13 , Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Hakan Kocaman <hkocam(at)googlemail(dot)com> wrote:
>> for whom it may concern:
>> http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/mosbench/
>> They tested with 8.3.9, i wonder what results 9.0 would give.
>> Best regards and keep up the good work
>> Hakan
>
> Here's the most relevant bit to us:
<snip/>
> The use of lock-free
> techniques seems quite interesting; unfortunately, I know next to
> nothing about the topic and this paper doesn't provide much of an
> introduction. Anyone have a reference to a good introductory paper on
> the topic?
The README in the postgres section of the git repo leads me to think the code that includes the fixes it there, if someone wants to look into it (wrt to the Postgres lock manager changes). Didn't check the licensing.
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-04 17:47:48 | Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-04 17:32:34 | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-04 17:47:48 | Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-04 17:13:36 | Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |