| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib? |
| Date: | 2011-01-17 16:27:16 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTimbbL1CVNSuBvhC-jASViLD+XgV2stOgr=o7P9w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Is there value in moving test_fsync to /contrib?
>>
>> Why would we want to do that?
>
> If we expect users to run the tool to best choose the best
> wal_sync_method.
I don't see how moving it from src/tools to contrib is going to make
that happen more often. src/tools to src/bin might have that effect.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2011-01-17 16:40:31 | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-17 16:19:20 | Re: Spread checkpoint sync |