Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?
Date: 2011-01-17 16:16:21
Message-ID: 201101171616.p0HGGLk01885@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> > Is there value in moving test_fsync to /contrib?
>
> Why would we want to do that?

If we expect users to run the tool to best choose the best
wal_sync_method.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-01-17 16:19:20 Re: Spread checkpoint sync
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-01-17 16:12:15 Re: Moving test_fsync to /contrib?