From: | Rajesh Kumar Mallah <mallah(dot)rajesh(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: streaming replication question |
Date: | 2010-10-04 17:57:33 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTimWOoumeNHf2AzKMNxJUybCGxqzNkV3xiOYWWM3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Dear Masao ,
Thanks so much for the response ,
I actually i am in a position to do rigorous stress testing because i have
the machines at my disposal.
I am sorry that i was not in touch with the lists for a prolong duration and
could not followup much
on the discussions while HS & SR were being developed.hence i am mostly
relying on the published
documents only. The wiki that i used does not say much about how to manage
the wal files that are
archived in primary and standby(possibly).
I am currently aiming to setup only SR between 2 servers only.
in primary server i have
---------------------------------------------------------------------
wal_level = hot_standby
max_wal_senders = 5
wal_keep_segments = 32
archive_mode = on
archive_command = 'cp %p /mnt/disk1/pgdatadir/wal_archives/%f'
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
in slave sever i have additionally
hot_standby = on # in postgresql.conf
and recovery.con in slave is:
--------------
standby_mode = 'on'
primary_conninfo = 'host=172.16.10.139 port=5432 user=postgres'
trigger_file = '/mnt/disk1/pgdatadir/trigger'
restore_command = 'cp /mnt/disk1/pgdatadir/wal_archives/%f "%p"'
-----------------------
My question is in SR setup do i need to keep transferring the archived WAL
files also ?
when the slave requests WAL records from the master does the master consult
the archived
wal files also for sending the records ?
anticipating your enlightening answers
your respectfully
Rajesh Kumar Mallah.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2010-10-04 18:02:59 | Re: streaming replication question |
Previous Message | Lumber Cartel, local 42 | 2010-10-04 17:21:07 | Re: Win2k? Really? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Markus Wanner | 2010-10-04 17:57:50 | Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?) |
Previous Message | Dan Ports | 2010-10-04 17:55:45 | Re: MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |