Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)

From: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: standby registration (was: is sync rep stalled?)
Date: 2010-10-04 17:57:50
Message-ID: 4CAA159E.1060000@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/04/2010 05:20 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
> Quorum commit, even with configurable vote weights, can't handle a
> requirement that a particular commit be replicated to (A || B) && (C
> || D).

Good point.

Can the proposed standby registration configuration format cover such a
requirement?

Regards

Markus Wanner

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Devrim GÜNDÜZ 2010-10-04 17:59:57 Re: pgadmin3_90 package
Previous Message Rajesh Kumar Mallah 2010-10-04 17:57:33 Re: streaming replication question