| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
| Date: | 2010-05-06 04:32:43 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTil87FpZ7LwY-GgqzZbHbtgVipVieo5Fa9-Af4g8@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> If someone wants to suggest that HS is useless if max_standby_delay
> supports only boolean values, I am ready to suggest we remove HS as well
> and head to 9.0 because that would suggest that HS itself is going to be
> useless.
I think HS is going to be a lot less useful than many people think, at
least in 9.0. But I think ripping out max_standby_delay will make it
worse.
> The code will not be thrown away; we will bring it back for 9.1.
If that's the case, then taking it out makes no sense.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-05-06 04:41:42 | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |
| Previous Message | Jesper Krogh | 2010-05-06 04:32:09 | Re: pg_migrator to /contrib in a later 9.0 beta |