| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
| Date: | 2010-05-06 05:38:16 |
| Message-ID: | 4BE255C8.3020002@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> The code will not be thrown away; we will bring it back for 9.1.
>
> If that's the case, then taking it out makes no sense.
I doubt we're going to bring back the same code, because it still has
the same issues. But we will do something better thought-out. Or people
are happy with the boolean and no-one cares anymore, that's pretty
likely too.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rob Wultsch | 2010-05-06 06:15:53 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-05-06 05:35:49 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |