From: | Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [9.0] On temporary tables |
Date: | 2010-09-30 14:12:33 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikm4yyR9ERO4Ky_0N0Nuw0yrixvwkxoOdTpVAep@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2010/9/30 Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>:
> On 9/30/2010 8:52 AM, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
>>
>> I was also thinking about using the catalog, but it looked to me
>> "easier" my way.
>> And, of course, if you have better advises for a "session variables"
>> solution, my ears are open.
>
> More of a question: why use temp tables at all? What does that offer that a
> single, regular, session table does not?
In my mind it can be a good and simple solution when I have more than
1 user needing a
set of "personal" variables for each connection/session.
Better advises are welcome, of course.
--
Vincenzo Romano at NotOrAnd Information Technologies
Software Hardware Networking Training Support Security
--
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-09-30 14:13:45 | Re: [9.0] On temporary tables |
Previous Message | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz | 2010-09-30 14:09:34 | Re: [9.0] On temporary tables |