Re: [9.0] On temporary tables

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Vincenzo Romano <vincenzo(dot)romano(at)notorand(dot)it>
Cc: PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [9.0] On temporary tables
Date: 2010-09-30 14:06:37
Message-ID: 4CA4996D.7080309@squeakycode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 9/30/2010 8:52 AM, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
>
> I was also thinking about using the catalog, but it looked to me
> "easier" my way.
> And, of course, if you have better advises for a "session variables"
> solution, my ears are open.

More of a question: why use temp tables at all? What does that offer
that a single, regular, session table does not?

-Andy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2010-09-30 14:07:05 Re: PostgreSQL server not starting.
Previous Message Vincenzo Romano 2010-09-30 14:06:00 Re: [9.0] On temporary tables