| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | do we need to postpone beta4? |
| Date: | 2010-07-27 18:04:04 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikNOJYxJ7Wc1GPv75xC93ahMRLzgBspoyMw26Hi@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I think we should consider postponing beta4. I count eleven
non-documentation, 9.0-specific bug fix on REL9_0_STABLE, but there
are currently five items on the open 9.0 issues list, at least one of
which appears to be a new bug in 9.0, and we just got a bug report on
pgsql-bugs from Valentine Gogichashvili complaining of what looks to
be a crasher in the redo path for heap_xlog_update(). It seems
unlikely at this point that we can have all of these issues fixed and
still have time for a full buildfarm cycle before the wrap. Does it
make sense to put out a beta with known bugs (presumably requiring
another beta) at this point, or should we push this off a bit?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2010-07-27 18:06:15 | page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-07-27 17:39:02 | Re: PostGIS vs. PGXS in 9.0beta3 |