Re: do we need to postpone beta4?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: do we need to postpone beta4?
Date: 2010-07-27 18:11:02
Message-ID: 10522.1280254262@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I think we should consider postponing beta4. I count eleven
> non-documentation, 9.0-specific bug fix on REL9_0_STABLE, but there
> are currently five items on the open 9.0 issues list, at least one of
> which appears to be a new bug in 9.0, and we just got a bug report on
> pgsql-bugs from Valentine Gogichashvili complaining of what looks to
> be a crasher in the redo path for heap_xlog_update(). It seems
> unlikely at this point that we can have all of these issues fixed and
> still have time for a full buildfarm cycle before the wrap. Does it
> make sense to put out a beta with known bugs (presumably requiring
> another beta) at this point, or should we push this off a bit?

If we don't wrap a beta this week, the next possible window is several
weeks away, because various people will be on vacation. So I think we
should get the existing fixes out there, even if there are known bugs
remaining. A beta is not an RC.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-07-27 18:17:43 Re: do we need to postpone beta4?
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2010-07-27 18:06:15 page corruption on 8.3+ that makes it to standby