| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Timeout and wait-forever in sync rep |
| Date: | 2010-10-22 04:46:39 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTik30veV=N1R=Gshq1-QQdDpRBa5D02g+keF4S7N@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As the result of the discussion, I think that we need the following two
>> parameters for the case where the standby goes down.
>
> Can we have a parameter that calls a operating system command when a
> standby is declared dead, to notify the administrator?
For me, that command is useful to STONITH the standby when the master
detects the disconnection. I agree to add that parameter.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-10-22 04:58:48 | Re: Simplifying replication |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-10-22 03:31:54 | Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types |