Re: Simplifying replication

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Simplifying replication
Date: 2010-10-22 04:58:48
Message-ID: AANLkTi=Nz06NGkUAEzJ7r=CMRsiUAJXRsWALqw-jZ62A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> I think it's pretty well explained in the fine manual.
>>
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/runtime-config-wal.html#GUC-WAL-KEEP-SEGMENTS
>
> Nope.  No relationship to checkpoint_segments is explained there.  Try
> again?

Please see
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-10/msg00038.php

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-10-22 05:50:14 Re: crash in plancache with subtransactions
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-10-22 04:46:39 Re: Timeout and wait-forever in sync rep