From: | Daniel Farina <drfarina(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Date: | 2011-02-10 22:52:54 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTik--1rdSK2nevhmWu9MQxn49CwQ0W-sPqtOkHm9@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Per:
>
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607109
>
> It seems we may have a problem to consider. As far as I know, we are the
> only major platform that supports libedit but our default is readline.
> Unfortunately readline is not compatible with OpenSSL (apparently?)
> licensing.
>
> This seems that it may be a problem for us considering the pre-package
> builds we do.
>
> What does everyone think? Should we work on getting libedit up to snuff?
I have to admit, this change in debian packaging -- which I have
noticed, and not a little -- makes my hands angry. I considered
looking into the problem, but were I doing it, I would have considered
teaching psql to support NSS or GnuTLS as totally viable alternatives
to this problem, as to keep readline.
--
fdr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-02-10 22:55:55 | Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-10 22:45:23 | Re: SPI_exec doesn't return proc context (on 9.1) |