Re: SPI_exec doesn't return proc context (on 9.1)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SPI_exec doesn't return proc context (on 9.1)
Date: 2011-02-10 22:45:23
Message-ID: 8918.1297377923@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> I wrote such a patch some time ago but never applied it ...
> http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/20091116162531.GA3669@alvh.no-ip.org
> I still wonder if it's useful enough to be applied. Would it solve your
> use case?

Needs to be fixed to behave sanely for the typbyval case (as
implemented, it's depending on the caller to check that).
Otherwise, seems pretty reasonable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2011-02-10 22:52:54 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-10 22:41:35 Re: ALTER EXTENSION UPGRADE, v3