From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: template0 database comment |
Date: | 2011-03-12 14:11:28 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=mM7nQ2vx-KWoGfmHpfEy4DcOd3ps21snMr7-h@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12 March 2011 13:59, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> On 3/12/11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> >> People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
>> >> attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No
>> >> initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment.
>> >
>> >> + "COMMENT ON DATABASE template0 IS 'only used by pg_dump';\n",
>> >
>> > No objection to the concept, but the actual text of this comment is
>> > approximately 100% wrong.
>> >
>>
>> I'd like to lodge a formal objection to the use of the word
>> 'approximately' in the above comment.
>
> OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I
> don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
'original template database' ?
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-12 14:14:32 | Re: template0 database comment |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-03-12 13:59:29 | Re: template0 database comment |