From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: template0 database comment |
Date: | 2011-03-12 13:59:29 |
Message-ID: | 201103121359.p2CDxTU28901@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page wrote:
> On 3/12/11, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> >> People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
> >> attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No
> >> initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment.
> >
> >> + "COMMENT ON DATABASE template0 IS 'only used by pg_dump';\n",
> >
> > No objection to the concept, but the actual text of this comment is
> > approximately 100% wrong.
> >
>
> I'd like to lodge a formal objection to the use of the word
> 'approximately' in the above comment.
OK, funny guys. ;-) Can someone give me the right text. Obviously I
don' know what template0 is used for either. Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2011-03-12 14:11:28 | Re: template0 database comment |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2011-03-12 13:32:24 | memory-related bugs |