| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql \dt and table size |
| Date: | 2011-03-25 16:17:08 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=k8-WWZkPtUsgBg3vOFE=kW6MQCbXiZ_k2=ZLR@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2011/3/25 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>:
> Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of vie mar 25 02:48:49 -0300 2011:
>> 2011/3/24 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
>> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> >> can we enhance a detail for table and show more accurate numbers?
>> >>
>> >> table size: xxx
>> >> toast size: xxx
>> >> indexes size: xxx
>> >
>> > Only if we don't mind going beyond 80 columns.
>>
>> sure, it is on new lines
>
> That could get very long ... are you proposing something like
> \d++ ?
\d++ is good idea. I don't thing so it's necessary for detail about
sizes. But it can be used for super detail:
* sizes of all indexes
* statistics of usage
* statistics of indexes
maybe - it is just idea.
Pavel
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
> The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
> PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-03-25 16:26:14 | Re: How to Make a pg_filedump |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-03-25 15:58:57 | Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache |