From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql \dt and table size |
Date: | 2011-03-25 15:55:52 |
Message-ID: | 1301068512-sup-3412@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Excerpts from Pavel Stehule's message of vie mar 25 02:48:49 -0300 2011:
> 2011/3/24 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >> can we enhance a detail for table and show more accurate numbers?
> >>
> >> table size: xxx
> >> toast size: xxx
> >> indexes size: xxx
> >
> > Only if we don't mind going beyond 80 columns.
>
> sure, it is on new lines
That could get very long ... are you proposing something like
\d++ ?
--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2011-03-25 15:58:57 | Re: 2nd Level Buffer Cache |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-03-25 15:51:44 | Re: Transactional DDL, but not Serializable |