From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Void binary patch |
Date: | 2011-02-22 16:31:22 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=WboSK12ZDCR3vC2wSeOfdaAQ9dOcPjOrtMVnK@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> What problem does this fix?
>
>> void returning functions may not be called when binary protocol is
>> requested currently. this is annoying: some drivers that wrap libpq
>> or the protocol directly use the binary mode exclusively and this
>> causes headaches for them. put another way, 'void' is the only POD
>> type missing send/recv.
>
> Yeah, this has been discussed before.
>
> Even though this patch is far past the CF deadline, I'm a bit tempted to
> push it into 9.1 anyway, just so we can check off that problem.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-02-22 16:33:25 | Re: PostgreSQL FDW update |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-22 15:41:24 | Re: Sync Rep v17 |