Re: Void binary patch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Radosław Smogura <rsmogura(at)softperience(dot)eu>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Void binary patch
Date: 2011-02-22 15:15:07
Message-ID: 29479.1298387707@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> What problem does this fix?

> void returning functions may not be called when binary protocol is
> requested currently. this is annoying: some drivers that wrap libpq
> or the protocol directly use the binary mode exclusively and this
> causes headaches for them. put another way, 'void' is the only POD
> type missing send/recv.

Yeah, this has been discussed before.

Even though this patch is far past the CF deadline, I'm a bit tempted to
push it into 9.1 anyway, just so we can check off that problem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-22 15:22:59 Re: OUTER keyword
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-02-22 15:13:59 Re: OUTER keyword