Re: missing tags

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: missing tags
Date: 2010-10-02 14:45:44
Message-ID: AANLkTi=W54-Su5c+76Nc+5=QLKMchnryh70qbYngZe1B@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>> I think the confusion is from the use of "tagged" in the commit
>> message
>
> Possibly Marc should adopt the habit of making the commit messages read
> like "Stamp 9.0.2", rather than "Tag".

+1, that sounds like a good idea.

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-10-02 15:09:32 Re: missing tags
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-02 14:08:57 Re: missing tags