| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: missing tags |
| Date: | 2010-10-02 15:09:32 |
| Message-ID: | 4CA74B2C.80805@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/02/2010 10:45 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 16:08, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander<magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 13:36, Andrew Dunstan<andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I think the confusion is from the use of "tagged" in the commit
>>> message
>> Possibly Marc should adopt the habit of making the commit messages read
>> like "Stamp 9.0.2", rather than "Tag".
> +1, that sounds like a good idea.
>
Yeah, I agree.
Where are the procedures actually documented?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Rajesh Kumar Mallah | 2010-10-02 16:02:44 | streaming replication question |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-10-02 14:45:44 | Re: missing tags |