Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements

From: Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>
To: "'Amit Kapila *EXTERN*'" <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tobias Bussmann <t(dot)bussmann(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel execution and prepared statements
Date: 2016-11-18 15:31:54
Message-ID: A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B539993FA@ntex2010i.host.magwien.gv.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Amit Kapila wrote:
> Can you once test by just passing CURSOR_OPT_PARALLEL_OK in
> PrepareQuery() and run the tests by having forc_parallel_mode=regress?
> It seems to me that the code in the planner is changed for setting a
> parallelModeNeeded flag, so it might work as it is.

No, that doesn't work.

But with Tobias' complete patch "make installcheck-world" succeeds.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-11-18 15:49:11 Re: [RFC] Should we fix postmaster to avoid slow shutdown?
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2016-11-18 15:16:00 Re: Push down more full joins in postgres_fdw