| From: | Jacques Lamothe <JLamothe(at)allconnect(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL |
| Date: | 2011-12-27 19:48:29 |
| Message-ID: | A464248CE14E60408AC030D3CD1790BA02720D@ACMAILNODE01.allconnect.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Correct, I'll take off
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org [mailto:pgsql-general-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of John R Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, December 27, 2011 2:46 PM
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL
On 12/27/11 11:34 AM, Jacques Lamothe wrote:
> Output
>
> [root(at)vpdb1 ~]# iptables -L -vn
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 44094 packets, 6327K bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:5436
>
> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
>
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 43575 packets, 6143K bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> [root(at)vpdb1 ~]#
it appears there's no iptables based firewall configured at all, the
default policy is ACCEPT, so there's really no point in that rule for 5436
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacques Lamothe | 2011-12-27 19:49:17 | Re: UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL |
| Previous Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-12-27 19:47:50 | Re: UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL |