From: | John R Pierce <pierce(at)hogranch(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL |
Date: | 2011-12-27 19:46:14 |
Message-ID: | 4EFA2086.2080104@hogranch.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 12/27/11 11:34 AM, Jacques Lamothe wrote:
> Output
>
> [root(at)vpdb1 ~]# iptables -L -vn
> Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 44094 packets, 6327K bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> 0 0 ACCEPT tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:5436
>
> Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
>
> Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT 43575 packets, 6143K bytes)
> pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
> [root(at)vpdb1 ~]#
it appears there's no iptables based firewall configured at all, the
default policy is ACCEPT, so there's really no point in that rule for 5436
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Adrian Klaver | 2011-12-27 19:47:50 | Re: UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL |
Previous Message | Jacques Lamothe | 2011-12-27 19:44:08 | Re: UNABLE TO CONNECT REMOTELY TO port 5436 - CRITICAL |