| From: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Version Number Function? |
| Date: | 2008-10-14 21:39:33 |
| Message-ID: | A13DE4F0-2F13-4ACE-9EDC-56B39AC596BB@kineticode.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Oct 14, 2008, at 14:32, Hannu Krosing wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 08:33 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> Well, the C version I borrowed from dumpitils seems to work great.
>> Any
>> reason I shouldn't stay with that?
>
> SQL is the only "PL" available by default, no need to compile or
> install
> anything.
>
> It can be written more effectively in almost any other pl, and
> probably
> in SQL as well ;)
Yes, but I'm putting this into pgTAP, where I already have some C
functions I'm defining, so another won't hurt any. :-)
Thanks,
David
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2008-10-14 21:44:13 | Re: spoonbill is failing citext test |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2008-10-14 21:36:59 | Re: TODO item: adding VERBOSE option to CLUSTER [with patch] |