Re: Version Number Function?

From: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Version Number Function?
Date: 2008-10-14 21:32:57
Message-ID: 1224019977.9912.7.camel@huvostro
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 08:33 -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> Well, the C version I borrowed from dumpitils seems to work great. Any
> reason I shouldn't stay with that?

SQL is the only "PL" available by default, no need to compile or install
anything.

It can be written more effectively in almost any other pl, and probably
in SQL as well ;)

---------------
Hannu

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2008-10-14 21:36:59 Re: TODO item: adding VERBOSE option to CLUSTER [with patch]
Previous Message Hannu Krosing 2008-10-14 21:30:16 Re: Window Functions