From: | Claudio Natoli <claudio(dot)natoli(at)memetrics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "'Joshua D(dot) Drake '" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "'pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org '" <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread |
Date: | 2003-11-13 23:27:52 |
Message-ID: | A02DEC4D1073D611BAE8525405FCCE2B028018@harris.memetrics.local |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
> 1. Are we just a bunch of Unix coders trying to develop
> a product for Win32 or are there any people a part of the Win32
> port project that actually have REAL, hardcore experience
> coding at the system level for Win32?
[yells "yes" from the back rows]
> 2. Have we built a test case? For example:
> [snip]
> Do it with CreateProcess and the with CreateThread... Time the
> difference, and review the load on the server during the tests...
I agree wholeheartedly with the comments made previously by Steve Tibbett.
There is no point becoming fixated on the performance merits of
CreateProcess vs CreateThread until we have a working Win32 port, and the
most direct way to that end is CreateProcess. To wit, any comments I have
made previously on the relative benefits of using CreateProcess vs
CreateThread have been focused on "getting the port done", not "best
performance".
Cheers,
Claudio
---
Certain disclaimers and policies apply to all email sent from Memetrics.
For the full text of these disclaimers and policies see
<a
href="http://www.memetrics.com/emailpolicy.html">http://www.memetrics.com/em
ailpolicy.html</a>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marsh Ray | 2003-11-14 01:58:24 | Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2003-11-13 18:04:02 | Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread |