| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread |
| Date: | 2003-11-13 18:04:02 |
| Message-ID: | 3FB3C792.4020106@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers-win32 |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Hello,
>
> O.k. there has been a lot of discussion in regards to what the best
> method to take with PostgreSQL Win32 is.
> It seems that the community is set on using CreateProcess. If this is
> the case I have a couple of further questions:
>
> 1. Are we just a bunch of Unix coders trying to develop a product for
> Win32 or are there any people a part
> of the Win32 port project that actually have REAL, hardcore experience
> coding at the system level for Win32?
> I am not trying to be an antagonist but I it is a legitamate question.
Speaking for myself I am a Unix coder and proud of it :-) I don't know
how many times I have said in my professional life "I don't do Windows".
That's why I chose to make my major contribution to the project the
porting of initdb to C - it had to be done (and it took me quite a few
hours) but it didn't require a deep level of understanding of Windows.
OTOH there is clearly a deeper level of understanding and experience
around than I have.
I think the answer is a mixture.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Claudio Natoli | 2003-11-13 23:27:52 | Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-11-13 17:42:18 | Re: CreateProcess vs Create Thread |