Re: ecpg: issue related to preprocessor directives

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ecpg: issue related to preprocessor directives
Date: 2020-08-03 11:16:48
Message-ID: 9e6e15313816495fc9a5d452458351a1f095d7a6.camel@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

> Here's a proposed patch, which also clarifies the documentation,
> which seemed a bit confused/misleading to me.

Thanks Tom.

> As stated, I'm not sure it's wise to back-patch this aggressively
> ... but maybe it'd be okay to squeeze it into v13?

Fully agreed, back-patching sounds like a pretty risky approach. I
guess almost everyone who ran into this, fixed their code to work
correctly by now. I'd also prefer squeezing it into 13, let's not keep
this around for longer.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-08-03 13:46:54 Re: ecpg: issue related to preprocessor directives
Previous Message Ashutosh Sharma 2020-08-03 10:39:10 Re: ecpg: issue related to preprocessor directives