Re: ecpg: issue related to preprocessor directives

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ecpg: issue related to preprocessor directives
Date: 2020-08-03 13:46:54
Message-ID: 2327613.1596462414@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> As stated, I'm not sure it's wise to back-patch this aggressively
>> ... but maybe it'd be okay to squeeze it into v13?

> Fully agreed, back-patching sounds like a pretty risky approach. I
> guess almost everyone who ran into this, fixed their code to work
> correctly by now. I'd also prefer squeezing it into 13, let's not keep
> this around for longer.

Sounds good, done that way.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2020-08-31 12:53:51 ecpg: the comments inside the declare section are not outputted correctly.
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2020-08-03 11:16:48 Re: ecpg: issue related to preprocessor directives