Re: Recommendation to run vacuum FULL in parallel

From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Perumal Raj <perucinci(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Recommendation to run vacuum FULL in parallel
Date: 2019-04-03 06:22:05
Message-ID: 9de455158b3a777b2ed6cbe25ff7fc2d4f3a8a9c.camel@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Perumal Raj wrote:
> We are planning to reclaim unused space from 9.2 Version postgres Cluster,
>
> Method : VACUUM FULL
> DB Size : 500 GB
> Expected space to reclaim 150 GB
> work_mem : 250 MB
> maintenance_work_mem : 20 GB
>
> Question :
>
> 1. vacuumdb --j option (Parallel) not available for version 9.2.
> How to run vacuum full in parallel ? At present its taking 8Hrs if i run sequential ( vacuum full verbose;)

Run several scripts in parallel, where each of them vacuums some bloated tables.
Be warned that VACUUM (FULL) is quite I/O intense, so too much parallelism
might overload your I/O system and harm performance.

> 2. If we run vacuum full, Do we need to run REINDEX/ANALYZE exclusively ?

You don't need to run REINDEX, because that happens automatically.
You can use VACUUM (FULL, ANALYZE) to also gather statistics.

> 3. What is the best way to run VACUUM FULL with less window.

Identify which tables really need it rather than VACUUMing everything.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe
--
Cybertec | https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nadeem Akbar basha 2019-04-03 06:52:11 Reg: Pg_Ctl command help
Previous Message Ron 2019-04-03 06:22:02 Re: Recommendation to run vacuum FULL in parallel