| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |
| Date: | 2016-08-29 19:06:43 |
| Message-ID: | 9c466d33-9a2b-aa19-cd57-b6778df40236@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On 08/29/2016 11:46 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
>>>> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now.
>>>
>>> There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB,
>>> etc.)
>>
>> Do they have parallel query on a single node? I suppose you can have
>> multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature.
>
> I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY*
> thin slice to be claiming.
Yeah, it's certainly not terribly marketable. "First non-sharded
parallel query".
--
--
Josh Berkus
Red Hat OSAS
(any opinions are my own)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2016-08-29 19:20:37 | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2016-08-29 18:46:03 | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |