From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |
Date: | 2016-08-29 18:46:03 |
Message-ID: | 20160829184603.GD29482@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now.
> >
> > There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB,
> > etc.)
>
> Do they have parallel query on a single node? I suppose you can have
> multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature.
I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY*
thin slice to be claiming.
> Also, are there other *SQL* implementations?
Yep. You can run SQL in parallel atop Hadoop.
Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2016-08-29 19:06:43 | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2016-08-29 18:41:48 | Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query? |