Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Advocacy Group <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?
Date: 2016-08-29 18:46:03
Message-ID: 20160829184603.GD29482@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:41:48AM -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 08/29/2016 11:39 AM, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 08:41:15PM -0400, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >> I suspect not, but I can't think of another example right now.
> >
> > There are a fair number that beat us to that punch (GPDB, HadoopDB,
> > etc.)
>
> Do they have parallel query on a single node? I suppose you can have
> multiple shards-per-node, but that's still a different feature.

I don't know of one offhand, but that distinction seems like a *VERY*
thin slice to be claiming.

> Also, are there other *SQL* implementations?

Yep. You can run SQL in parallel atop Hadoop.

Also: https://shardquery.com/2014/02/25/shard-query-supports-background-jobs-query-parallelism-and-all-select-syntax/

Best,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2016-08-29 19:06:43 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2016-08-29 18:41:48 Re: Are we the first OSS database with parallel query?